Updated weekly ・ last 2026-10-03JAEN
Pharma Promotion / Incidents by company / GSK

GSK

33 incidents / jurisdictions: China, European Union, United Kingdom, United States / sum of amounts reported: GBP 37.0 m / USD 11.00 bn

DateJurisdictionOutcomeWhat happened (source)Damages / settlement / fine
2023United StatesFiled / under investigationIn November 2023, GSK filed a lawsuit against Moderna Inc. in U.S. federal court in Delaware, accusing the company of violating GSK's patents related to messenger RNA (mRNA) technology. The lawsuit cl
Wikipedia: GSK plc(Controversies)
—
2022-05-02United StatesJudgment against companySwiss Scientist Convicted by Federal Jury of Conspiracy to Steal Trade Secrets Belonging to GlaxoSmithKline
U.S. Department of Justice + 1 more reports
—
2022-01-03United StatesGuilty plea / convictionFourth Defendant Pleads Guilty to Stealing Trade Secrets from GlaxoSmithKline to Benefit Chinese Pharma Company
U.S. Department of Justice
—
2021-08-05United StatesFiled / under investigationGlaxosmithkline LLC v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
—
2020-10-02United StatesFiled / under investigationGlaxosmithkline LLC v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
—
2018-09-26United StatesOtherPeter Humphrey v. GlaxoSmithKline PLC
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
—
2018-08-22United StatesFiled / under investigationWendy B. Dolin v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit + 2 more reports
$3 million
2018-03-30United StatesFiled / under investigationTrisvan v. Heyman
District Court, E.D. New York
—
2018-03-08United StatesJudgment for company / dismissedGlaxoSmithKline LLC v. Teva Pharm. USA, Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
—
2017-08-04United StatesJudgment for company / dismissedAkerman v. GlaxoSmithKline, LCC
District Court, D. Massachusetts
—
2017-06-02United StatesOtherStephen Wendell v. Glaxosmithkline LLC
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
—
2016-02-17United StatesOtherUnited States Ex Rel. Hamrick v. Glaxosmithkline LLC
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
—
2016United KingdomFine / administrative sanctionIn February 2016, the company was fined over £37 million in the UK by the Competition and Markets Authority for paying Generics UK, Alpharma and Norton Healthcare more than £50m between 2001, and 2004
Wikipedia: GSK plc(Controversies)
£37 million
2015-03-06United StatesFiled / under investigationUnited States ex rel. Thorpe v. GlaxoSmithKline PLC
District Court, D. Massachusetts
—
2014United KingdomFiled / under investigationThe UK's Serious Fraud Office (SFO) opened a criminal inquiry in 2014 into GSK's sales practices, using powers granted by the Bribery Act 2010 . The SFO said it was collaborating with Chinese authorit
Wikipedia: GSK plc(Controversies)
—
2013-11-01United StatesSettlementOff-Label Drug Promotion and the Use of Disclaimers*
Texas law review
$3 billion
2013ChinaFine / administrative sanctionIn 2013, Chinese authorities announced that, since 2007, GSK had funnelled HK$3.8 billion in kickbacks to GSK managers, doctors, hospitals and others who prescribed their drugs, using over 700 travel
Wikipedia: GSK plc(Controversies) + 1 more reports
US$490 million
2013ChinaFiled / under investigationPhilips T (26 July 2013). "Chinese police allege Glaxo sales reps trained to offer sexual bribes" . The Daily Telegraph . Archived from the original on 11 January 2022.
Wikipedia: GSK plc(Controversies) + 1 more reports
—
2013United StatesSettlementAs part of the settlement GSK signed a five-year corporate integrity agreement with the Department of Health and Human Services , which obliged the company to make major changes in the way it did busi
Wikipedia: GSK plc(2012 criminal and civil settlement)
—
2012United StatesSettlement2012 | GlaxoSmithKline | $3 billion ($1B criminal, $2B civil) | Criminal: Off-label promotion, failure to disclose safety data. Civil: paying kickbacks to physicians, making false and misleading state
Wikipedia: List of largest pharmaceutical settlements + 8 more reports
$3 billion / US$956,814,400 / US$43,185,600
2012United StatesSettlementThe 2012 settlement included a criminal fine of US$242,612,800 for failing to report safety data to the FDA about Avandia ( rosiglitazone ), a diabetes drug approved in 1999, and a civil settlement of
Wikipedia: GSK plc(Controversies) + 1 more reports
US$242,612,800 / US$657 million
2010United StatesSettlement2010 | GlaxoSmithKline | $750 million | Poor manufacturing practices | Kytril , Bactroban , Paxil CR , Avandamet | False Claims Act, FDCA
Wikipedia: List of largest pharmaceutical settlements + 7 more reports
$750 million / US$150 million / US$600 million
2008-09-19United StatesOtherJohnson v. GlaxoSmithKline, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
—
2008-03-26United StatesOtherMasters v. Glaxosmithkline
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
—
2006United StatesSettlementIn 2006, in the United States GSK settled the largest tax dispute in IRS history, agreeing to pay US$3.1 billion. At issue were Zantac and other products sold in 1989 to 2005. The case revolved around
Wikipedia: GSK plc(Controversies)
US$3.1 billion
2005-07-14United StatesOtherIn Re GlaxoSmithKline Plc
Supreme Court of Minnesota
—
2004European UnionJudgment for company / dismissedItalian police sought bribery charges in May 2004, against 4,400 doctors and 273 GSK employees. GSK and its predecessor were accused of having spent £152m on physicians, pharmacists and others, giving
Wikipedia: GSK plc(Controversies)
—
2003-11-24United StatesOtherPharmacia Corp. v. GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare, L.P.
District Court, D. New Jersey + 1 more reports
—
2003United StatesFine / administrative sanctionGSK was fined for promoting Paxil/Seroxat ( paroxetine ) for treating depression in the under-18s, although the drug had not been approved for pediatric use. Paxil had US$4.97 billion worldwide sales
Wikipedia: GSK plc(Controversies) + 1 more reports
—
2002United StatesSettlementThe case began in 2002, when GSK sent experts to fix problems cited by the FDA. The lead inspector recommended recalls of defective products, but they were not authorised; she was fired in 2003, and f
Wikipedia: GSK plc(Controversies)
—
2001United KingdomFine / administrative sanctionIn 2001, the British Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) required GSK to withdraw its claim that Ribena Toothkind, a lower-sugar variety, did not encourage tooth decay. A company poster showed bottl
Wikipedia: GSK plc(Controversies)
US$217,000
2001United StatesFiled / under investigationFor 10 years GSK marketed Paxil as non-habit forming. In 2001, 35 patients filed a class-action suit alleging they had had withdrawal symptoms, and in 2002, a Los Angeles court issued an injunction pr
Wikipedia: GSK plc(Controversies) + 1 more reports
—
1998United StatesOtherThe charges stemmed from GSK's promotion of the anti-depressants Paxil ( paroxetine ) and Wellbutrin ( bupropion ) for unapproved uses from 1998 to 2003, specifically as suitable for patients under th
Wikipedia: GSK plc(Controversies) + 1 more reports
—
Amounts are extracted mechanically from headlines and summaries and kept only when Jev confirms they are paid by the company. The same case reported by several articles may be counted more than once, so totals are indicative. Check the sources.